Apple passing Microsoft stock on the S&P 500?

updated 06:05 pm EDT, Thu April 22, 2010

Apple may be larger than Microsoft on stock index


Apple is flirting with the prospects of overtaking Microsoft in the S&P 500 stock index, an estimate found Thursday. Following another rapid climb to a record high share price of $266.47, Apple's market cap when float-adjusted has reached $241.5 billion, or just past Microsoft's $239.5 billion. The achievement puts Apple only behind oil giant Exxon Mobil on the index.

The Mac creator is still behind Microsoft in absolute market cap as the new calculations don't include shares held by large-scale controllers such as other public companies. Near-constant upward growth in April, particularly after successive stock rallies in the two days since Apple's record winter quarter, has nonetheless closed the gap considerably and leaves a relatively small gap between Microsoft's $275.3 billion non-adjusted cap and Apple's $241.63 billion.

Much of Apple's performance in recent months has come from its consistently outperforming guidance from both analysts and itself, constantly outpacing the industry in computer sales, and expanding its potential through new devices like the iPad. Microsoft's share value has been largely stable over the past decade as its near-monopoly over operating systems and productivity apps has showed little signs of change. Most of its ventures beyond its core Windows and Office businesses, such as Windows Mobile and Zune, have either struggled to eke out profits or have often been money-losing prospects; its online services have regularly been drags on the entire company's revenue.

The market cap situation is likely to change in the wake of after-hours trading but may still favor Apple, as Microsoft's quarterly results have so far triggered a more than three percent drop in trading in share price where Apple's has moved less than a fifth of a point.




By Electronista Staff

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. Fonejacker

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +3

    Only a matter of time

    The iPad sales and profits haven't been included. And the product hasn't gone global yet. The new iPhone sales and profits are due to come, and maybe a few new products before Christmas 2010. Apple will surpass Microcopy no problem, it's a matter by how much further and how soon.

    My bottle of champagne is waiting to come out, and what a sweet drink that will be. If only I could be a fly on Ballmers wall. Monkey boy has been a bit quiet lately. Can't say I have missed him, but I do want him to blow a blood vessel. No, I take that back, I hope he stays at Microcopy for at least another 15 years. What a superb CEO he is. To be out smarted, outgrown, out innovated (Microcopy need to look up the word innovations meaning), by a much smaller outfit. CEO of the decade, Steve Jobs, dunce of the decade, Steve Ballmer.


  1. tsmelker

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2006

    -21

    Big whoop...

    Apple's stock has been triple or larger of what Micro$oft's has been for over a decade now. Where's the big surprise? But watch out-- Apple is on its deathbed now that Windows 7 is here. Apple and all its products are just fads, anyway. How can they possibly survive when they don't license their OS software to run on other computers?


  1. dscottbuch

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2000

    -5

    ?What?

    Not sure where this is coming from. There was an article briefly on AI which was apparently withdrawn with this same info. Apple market cap is $241.6 billion at close of market today but MSFT is still $275.3 billion, not $239 billion. Apple is closing and will likely catch MSFT in the next 2 years but not there yet.


  1. Flying Meat

    Junior Member

    Joined: Jan 2007

    +3

    Maybe that is where

    the magical "float-adjusted" comes into play?

    I don't know, I'm just throwin' it out there as a question. Not as some sorta answer as a question thingee.


  1. elroth

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2006

    +7

    @Big whoop..

    Thanks, tsmelker - it's always good to get an "Apple is doomed!" post to lighten up the board. I love it - Apple is doomed!


  1. WiseWeasel

    Junior Member

    Joined: Apr 1999

    +4

    Wow

    Congratulations, Apple! My stock portfolio has certainly appreciated all the effort, and my life is richer for it as well! This is truly a momentous inflection point in tech industry history. This event drives home the point that all the resources in the world are squandered without a solid vision to guide them, while foresight, execution, superior design and good sense of timing can turn a huge industry on its head in a decade. The shake-up from all this is also spawning a great deal of innovation in software interface design and capabilities, and driving red-hot competitive activity from the likes of Google/Android and various other Linux derivatives. Apple has lit the entire tech industry ablaze, drawing incredulous and then humbled responses from competitors as they've watched them dispense of decades of cruft that had built up unnoticed through neglect and complacency, with nothing but a few well-placed matches. Note to competitors: if you're not moving the ball forward at Apple's pace, they're gunning for you. If you try to hold them back, they'll stomp on you.

    Meanwhile, Microsoft is busy competing with itself and executing more poorly than ever as it tries to expand into new markets. The latest example of a destructive use of resources being the announcement of two competing phone platforms, splitting their marketing investment and mindshare between the MS-branded Kin and the Windows Phone 7 OS licensed to OEMs. You have the Windows Mobile software division competing with the handset division they acquired when they bought Danger, and probably making handset OEM partners think twice about investing heavily in WP7. This is a perfect example of a muddled and poorly thought out execution strategy, where not only does one hand not know what the other is doing, but you have both hands competing for marketing resources only to go out and compete with the other's products. It's pure madness, and their stagnant stock value appears to be well-earned. MS is the new IBM, going purely on momentum at this point.


  1. climacs

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2001

    +4

    @WiseWeasel

    I, too, was astounded when Microsuck announced Kin, on top of WinPhone 7. I mean, MS' missteps are par for the course but anyone not in the Redmond distortion sphere could perceive how dumb of an idea this is.

    MS as IBM is dead-on correct. Now if someone could figure out a way to kick the legs out from under Windows and Office...


  1. Fast iBook

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2003

    +3

    Sad...

    It's sad when an innovative company ranks 2nd or 3rd behind do-nothing-good-and-profit companies like msft and standard oil of america (exxon).

    - A


  1. Fast iBook

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2003

    -10

    Oh....

    Oh, all most forgot to point out that while AAPL has 906,795,000 shares outstanding, MSFT has 8,770,461,000.... If you valued the per share price the same, msft would be a lot smaller, and more representative of how important they really are in the world.

    $28,464,295,050 = MSFT market cap if they had the same number (906,975,000) of shares as AAPL.

    $2,339,520,471,800 = AAPL market cap if they had the same number (8,770,461,000) of shares as MSFT.

    28.4 billion vs 2.33 trillion....

    Kinda puts things in perspective, doesn't it? :)

    - A


  1. jreades

    Junior Member

    Joined: Feb 1999

    +6

    What are you smoking?

    Uh, Fast iBook do you have *any* idea what a share is? It's not some kind measurement unit like a yard or a metre or litre or something, so calculating a 'per share price' is meaningless. If I start a company and decide to issue 1,000 shares at $1 each, and you start one but decide to issue 100 shares at $10 each it's not like your company is worth ten times more. They're both worth $1,000. Which is why people talk about market cap, not per share price. And $2.3 trillion is about the GDP of the USA (if memory serves) so that is also a stupid number to throw around -- as much as I like Apple, they're not worth the rest of the entire American economy.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Recent Reviews

dcx

vccxv dfgdfgdfg ...

dfdsfsdfds'dfgdf

dsfdsfdsfdgdfgdfgdfgdfgdfgdfgdfgdfgdg ...

Today

Today Test Monady Today Test Monady ...

toggle

Most Commented